The Prime Minister of Canada’s official residence, 24 Sussex Drive, is one of the most iconic buildings in the country. It has been the home of every Canadian Prime Minister since 1951 and has hosted countless world leaders and dignitaries over the decades. However, the residence has been closed and unoccupied since 2015 due to serious structural and rodent issues, according to the National Capital Commission.
This situation raises a number of questions about the responsibilities of the Canadian government in preserving and maintaining its national heritage buildings. In particular, it highlights the dereliction of duty by the current administration to let politics and rhetoric of wasteful spending get in the way of properly fixing, renovating and upgrading the Prime Minister’s official residence.
Historically, 24 Sussex Drive has been a symbol of the Prime Minister’s authority and prestige. According to the Government of Canada, “the building itself was built by Joseph Merrill Currier, a prosperous lumber manufacturer. It was designed by his brother J.M. Currier, an architect who came from the U.S.A.”, and was completed in 1951 during the tenure of Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent. The cost to rennovate the 24 Sussex Drive in 1951 was $500,000 CDN which is equal to $5,935,940 in 2023. Since then, it has been the site of many important events, including state dinners, meetings with foreign dignitaries, and official ceremonies.
Over the years, the residence has undergone several renovations and upgrades to accommodate the changing needs of each Prime Minister and their families. These have included the addition of a swimming pool, a private theater, and various security features.
Despite its important role in Canadian history and politics, 24 Sussex Drive has been neglected. The building’s deteriorating condition has been the subject of numerous reports, with many experts warning of structural issues if significant repairs are not made.
Despite this, the Canadian government has failed to take action to fix the residence. There are a number of reasons for this, including concerns over the cost of repairs, political opposition to spending taxpayer dollars on the Prime Minister’s residence, and a general lack of political will to address the issue.
While these concerns are understandable, they do not excuse the government’s failure to address the issue. The Prime Minister’s official residence is a national heritage building and an important symbol of Canadian identity and prestige. Allowing it to fall into disrepair is a dereliction of duty on the part of the government.
Furthermore, the current situation is an embarrassment for Canada on the world stage. When foreign leaders and dignitaries come to visit, they expect to be hosted in an appropriate setting that reflects the country’s status as a modern, prosperous nation.
In contrast, Prime Minister Trudeau has been residing in Rideau Cottage, which is a charming and comfortable, however, it is not an appropriate substitute for the Prime Minister’s official residence, especially when foreign dignitaries come to visit. It is time for the Canadian government to recognize the importance of the Prime Minister’s official residence and take the appropriate actions.
One possible solution is to demolish the current building and build a new, modern residence in its place. This would be an expensive undertaking, but it would ensure that the Prime Minister has a suitable and secure residence that is fit for purpose in the 21st century.
Another option is to undertake a comprehensive restoration and renovation of the existing building. This would require a significant investment of time and money, but it would ensure that the building is preserved for future generations and continues to play an important role in Canadian history and politics.
Regardless of the approach taken, it is clear that the Canadian government must take action to address the current state of 24 Sussex Drive. Allowing it to fall into disrepair is not only a dereliction of duty, but also a betrayal of Canada’s national heritage laws otherwise, why do we have them?
About The Author
