Trading Politics: 2 Traders Mirror Congressional Committee Members Stock Trades For Profits

Allegations of insider trading in the US Congress have made a lot of millionaires

In stock trading, where information is power, two individuals from Brookline, Missouri, known simply as Ben and Jackson, are the definition of young and uber-smart entrepreneurs. They figured out how to tap into the vast wealth of information only members of Congress know and turn it into a business. Although relatively unknown to the public, these savvy traders have devised a unique strategy that sets them apart from the average stockbroker. Their company, Bors Finance, focuses on mirroring the trades made by members of the United States Congress. This intriguing approach raises questions about politicians’ alleged insider trading practices and the potential benefits of following their financial activities.

It is no secret that many members of Congress seem to amass significant wealth during their time in office. While they may enter politics with limited networks, they often retire with fortunes worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. This phenomenon has led to accusations and suspicions of insider trading among politicians.

Members of Congress are privy to sensitive information that can greatly impact the stock market. As they serve on influential economic committees, they gain access to insider knowledge about impending legislation, contracts, budget initiatives, and other pertinent details. This information, often undisclosed to the average citizen, can result in substantial gains or losses in the stock market.

Several incidents have occurred over the years that have brought the issue of insider trading by members of Congress into the spotlight. While politicians typically deny engaging in such practices, their trading records often raise eyebrows. Here are a few notable incidents:

Congressman Tom Price: The former Republican Congressman who later served as the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Trump administration faced allegations of insider trading in 2017. Price was accused of purchasing stock in a healthcare company while sponsoring legislation that could impact the company’s financial prospects. Price’s trades occurred while he was a House Ways and Means Committee member, which plays a crucial role in healthcare policy. The situation raised questions about whether Price had utilized his privileged position to gain inside knowledge and potentially profit from it. Although Price denied any wrongdoing, the incident shed light on the perceived conflicts of interest arising when lawmakers engage in stock trading.

Congressman Chris Collins: In 2018, the Republican Congressman from New York was embroiled in a high-profile insider trading scandal. Collins faced accusations of sharing confidential information with his son, enabling them to avoid substantial losses in a pharmaceutical company’s stock. It was alleged that Collins learned of negative results from a drug trial before they were made public. Shortly after receiving this sensitive information, Collins and his son sold their shares, saving them from the subsequent decline in stock value. Eventually, Collins was indicted, found guilty of insider trading, and sentenced to 26 months in prison, highlighting the unethical and illegal nature of such practices among politicians.

Senator Kelly Loeffler: Former Republican from Georgia faced allegations of insider trading in 2020. Loeffler and her husband, the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, were accused of selling millions of dollars worth of stocks after attending a confidential briefing on the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The trades occurred just before the stock market experienced a significant downturn due to the pandemic’s economic effects. Loeffler’s actions raised concerns about whether she had used her position as a senator to gain insider knowledge and protect her financial interests. Though no charges were filed against her, the incident brought the issue of congressional insider trading back into the public eye.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi: the Former Democratic Speaker, came under scrutiny for her stock trading activities. It was revealed that Pelosi and her husband purchased shares in several technology companies that benefited from major contracts awarded by the US government. Pelosi would have known this information as she was on the House Judiciary Committee, which Pelosi, the House speaker, regulates. The timing raised questions about whether Pelosi had access to non-public information that influenced her investment decisions. While Pelosi’s trades were not explicitly deemed illegal, they fueled concerns about potential conflicts of interest and insider trading among high-ranking members of Congress.

Allegations of insider trading are not limited to any particular political party or level of government. Senators, members of Congress, governors, mayors, city councillors, and politicians across the spectrum have faced insider trading accusations. The pursuit of personal financial gain can sometimes compromise the integrity of elected officials, regardless of their political affiliation. The potential impact on their financial empires reminds us that no politician is immune to temptations when sensitive information intersects with personal wealth. These allegations highlight the importance of upholding ethical standards and ensuring transparency in the financial activities of all elected officials.

Given the suspicions and evidence surrounding insider trading by members by elected officials, there is a strong argument for imposing trading restrictions on politicians, their spouses, and partners. By excluding themselves from stock trading, they can avoid conflicts of interest and the perception of using their position for personal financial gain. Implementing stricter regulations would foster transparency, trust, and public confidence in the political system.

The trading duo took a different approach in this alleged political insider trading landscape. Realizing the potential benefits of following Congress members’ financial activities, they developed a trading strategy based on mirroring their trades. By monitoring the trades made by politicians and leveraging their expansive networks, Ben and Jackson can position themselves advantageously in the stock market.

Their reliance on discord groups allows them to disseminate information quickly among their followers. By sharing insights about trades made by members of Congress, they provide valuable knowledge that goes beyond the typical analysis found in stock prospectuses and daily stock market shows. Their approach puts a spotlight on the integrity of politicians and highlights the potential benefits that can be gained by monitoring their financial activities. The alleged insider trading incidents by Congress members, coupled with the need for politicians to restrict themselves from trading, further emphasize the significance of their trading strategy.

More great reading