Image Credit, Canada Senate
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s appointment of Charles Adler to the Senate has sparked significant public discussion, particularly in response to concerns raised by the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs (AMC). Adler, a prominent radio host and columnist, is known for his strong opinions, which have earned him both respect and controversy over the years. The AMC’s objections to his appointment have brought to light the implications of his past remarks on his new role.
Adler is recognized as a distinguished journalist who has long been a vocal advocate for Manitobans, bringing attention to various important issues. His influence in Manitoba and his respect within the media industry suggest that many believe he will continue to be a strong voice for the province in the Senate.
However, the First Nations organization has expressed deep concern over certain comments made by Adler, particularly those in which he referred to Indigenous people as “uncivilized boneheads” and criticized First Nations leadership. These remarks have been highlighted by the AMC as part of a broader pattern of commentary that they find offensive and harmful. The AMC previously filed formal complaints regarding Adler’s statements and has now requested that the Governor General and the Prime Minister reconsider his Senate appointment.
Grand Chief Cathy Merrick, stated, “The appointment of Charles Adler to the Senate is a grave insult to all First Nations in Manitoba and across Canada.” The AMC views this appointment as a setback in the ongoing efforts toward reconciliation and the recognition of First Nations rights.
The process of becoming a senator is theoretically rigorous, involving an application or nomination, followed by a committee review. This committee is responsible for vetting candidates and making recommendations to the Prime Minister, who then acts on these suggestions. However, the actual criteria for who secures a seat in the Red Chamber—a body that many Canadians believe should be abolished—remains opaque. The committee’s role is crucial, as it is tasked with ensuring that nominees are fit for the position. If the committee had thoroughly vetted Adler, they would have been aware of his body of work.
Despite the current controversy, Adler is unlikely to resign. As an appointed senator, he holds his position until the age of 75 unless he voluntarily steps down or is removed—something that is rare in Canadian politics. It is not unreasonable to think Adler may issue a carefully crafted apology or statement to address the criticisms, after which the Senate will likely return to its usual routine.
It is also important to note that Adler has not only been critical of Indigenous leadership; he has been very critical of prime ministers, members of parliament, mayors, city councillors, business leaders, and others. His commentary has spanned a wide range of issues, reflecting his willingness to challenge authority and speak his mind on various matters. This context is important, as it demonstrates that his critiques are not limited to one group but are part of a broader approach to holding public figures accountable.
As Canada continues to navigate these complex issues, the appointment of Charles Adler serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between respecting free speech and addressing the concerns of those who feel marginalized by certain viewpoints. The focus now shifts to how Adler will fulfill his responsibilities in the Senate and whether he will continue to be the strong voice for Manitobans that many expect him to be.
About The Author
